The most time-sensitive immigration program in the United States.
The Diversity Visa lottery, established under INA § 203(c), allocates 55,000 immigrant visas annually to nationals of countries with historically low immigration rates to the U.S. Selected applicants are eligible to apply for an immigrant visa — but only if their case is fully adjudicated by September 30 of the fiscal year of selection. There is no extension. There is no rollover. A visa not issued by the deadline is permanently lost. DV mandamus is among the most urgent and time-critical mandamus litigation in the immigration system.
For every other immigration program, government delay produces additional waiting. For DV lottery cases, government delay produces loss of the visa itself. The statute and regulations are unambiguous: a DV-selected applicant whose immigrant visa is not issued by September 30 of the fiscal year of selection loses eligibility entirely. The selection cannot be carried over to the next year.
The DV lottery process spans roughly 17 months from initial selection to the September 30 deadline. The applicant must complete the DS-260 immigrant visa application, pay the visa fee, submit civil documents, schedule and attend a consular interview, and receive a visa — all within that window. Even minor delays at any stage can compound into a foreclosed case.
The Department of State periodically publishes updates on DV processing timelines. When delays at the National Visa Center or at specific consular posts become severe, mandamus litigation may be the only tool available to compel processing in time to meet the deadline.
The TRAC analysis for DV cases is unusually compressed. Factor two (congressional timetables) is more than just supportive — it is dispositive. Congress wrote the September 30 deadline into the statute itself, and the entire DV program is structured around that deadline. Every other TRAC factor must be read in light of factor two's clarity.
For DV mandamus cases filed early in the fiscal year, the litigation typically seeks an order directing processing within a specified period sufficient to permit visa issuance before September 30. For cases filed late in the fiscal year — particularly in June, July, or August — the relief sought is more urgent, sometimes requiring emergency TRO or preliminary injunction practice to preserve eligibility past the deadline.
The D.C. District Court ordered the State Department to adjudicate DV cases for affected applicants past the fiscal year deadline in the context of the 2017 travel ban litigation. The ruling established that, where the deferral is the government's doing rather than the applicant's, equitable relief preserving eligibility past September 30 is available. The reasoning has been important in subsequent DV mandamus cases involving government-caused delay.
The D.C. Circuit confirmed that DV lottery delay claims are reviewable in federal court and that the September 30 deadline does not strip the courts of equitable authority to preserve eligibility where the government's own conduct caused the deadline to be missed. Almaqrami is now the leading appellate authority on DV mandamus.
If you have been selected in the DV lottery and your case is not progressing toward a consular interview, the time to consult counsel is the moment you suspect a delay. By the time the deadline is months away, options narrow significantly.
I prioritize DV cases by their proximity to the September 30 deadline. Cases filed in the spring of the fiscal year have the most flexibility; cases filed in the summer require emergency procedural posture.
My flat fee of $5,000 plus $500 in costs applies to DV mandamus cases. Where emergency injunctive relief is required to preserve eligibility, the case is evaluated individually.
I evaluate every inquiry personally and respond within one business day.
Contact Me → Back to HomeEvery inquiry comes to me personally. No call center, no associate, no paralegal.
Consular processing mandamus is the broader framework for visa-stage delays.
FOIA mandamus can produce the State Department case file.
DV cases raise interesting venue questions given Department of State defendants.
DV cases are often pleaded under both APA and mandamus statutes.